Fascism

Gradual Emergence of Fascism

Fascism often creeps in gradually, rather than arriving in a dramatic, overt fashion. It begins with seemingly minor political changes that can easily go unnoticed. Over time, these small aggressions and restrictions accumulate, until what was once objectionable becomes accepted.

This step-by-step process makes Fascism difficult to recognize and stop in its early stages. By the time its true nature becomes clear, it has already gained a firm foothold. The book emphasizes how Fascism exploits this gradual emergence to take hold, making it a insidious threat to democracies.

The incremental nature of Fascism's rise is a key insight. It highlights how Fascism can quietly erode democratic norms and institutions, before the public fully realizes what is happening. Recognizing and resisting this gradual encroachment is crucial to preventing Fascism from taking root.

Here are specific examples from the context that support the key insight about the gradual emergence of Fascism:

• The passage states that Fascism "rarely makes a dramatic entrance" and instead "begins with a seemingly minor character" who gains power as events unfold. This gradual process is illustrated by the examples of Mussolini in a crowded cellar and Hitler on a street corner.

• The passage describes how "small aggressions, if unopposed, grow into larger ones" and "what was objectionable is accepted" over time, allowing Fascism to spread. This is exemplified by the quote about how the government silences one media outlet, then finds it easier to silence another.

• The passage includes the testimony of a German witness who describes how the rise of the Third Reich happened "step by step" in a way that was hard to notice "from day to day", like a farmer not seeing the corn growing in their field. This gradual, incremental process is contrasted with the sudden realization that "everything, everything, has changed and changed completely."

• The passage details how Mussolini's Fascist party initially included diverse factions - "Fascists of the left", "of the right", and "of the center" - before consolidating power. This illustrates how Fascism can gain a foothold through a gradual accumulation of support from different groups.

Key terms:

• Gradual emergence: The process by which Fascism develops incrementally rather than suddenly.
• Seemingly minor character: A person who initially appears insignificant but gains power as events unfold.
• Small aggressions: Minor actions that, if left unchecked, grow into larger abuses of power.
• Objectionable becomes accepted: Behaviors or policies that were once seen as unacceptable become normalized over time.

Populism's Dual Nature

Populism is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it can empower the common people and amplify their voices in the democratic process. Populist movements have historically given a platform to marginalized groups and challenged entrenched elites. This grassroots energy can reinvigorate a democracy.

However, populism also carries the risk of demagoguery and authoritarianism. Populist leaders may exploit people's fears and resentments to consolidate power, silence dissent, and undermine democratic institutions. They may claim to speak for "the people" while in reality serving their own interests or those of a narrow faction.

The key is to channel populism's positive potential - its ability to amplify neglected voices and demand accountability - while guarding against its darker tendencies towards intolerance and strongman rule. This requires a delicate balance, vigilant democratic safeguards, and a commitment to upholding the rights of all citizens, not just the majority. Populism's dual nature means it can either enrich or endanger a democracy, depending on how it is navigated by political leaders and engaged citizens.

Here are examples from the context that illustrate the dual nature of populism highlighted in the key insight:

• The narrative notes that populism has been wielded by a wide range of political figures, from Barack Obama and the Roosevelts to George Wallace and Ross Perot. This shows how populism can be used by both progressive and regressive forces.

• It states that populism is "not inherently biased or intolerant", but can be used by those seeking to "divide rather than to unite" and pursue "political victory at all costs."

• The examples of Huey Long and George Wallace demonstrate how populist rhetoric can be used to advance authoritarian and intolerant agendas, despite initially appealing to the "common people."

• In contrast, the "Dreamer" movement is cited as an example of a populist effort that aims to "empower voices not previously heeded" in a democratic manner.

• The narrative suggests that populism is more about a "means for seizing and holding power" than a specific ideology, which allows it to be co-opted by both democratic and anti-democratic forces.

So the context shows how populism can enrich democratic engagement when channeled towards expanding rights and representation, but also how it can pave the way for authoritarianism when used to consolidate power and scapegoat minority groups.

Technology's Role in Authoritarian Control

Technology has become a powerful tool for authoritarian regimes to exert control over their populations. Social media platforms allow these regimes to spread disinformation and manipulate public opinion on a massive scale. They can generate fake content that depicts politicians doing or saying things they never did, then target this content to specific individuals based on their online profiles. This allows authoritarian leaders to discredit opponents and sow division within societies.

The low cost and ease of disseminating falsehoods online makes this a particularly effective tactic. Fact-checkers struggle to keep up with the rapid pace of these disinformation campaigns, which are only growing more sophisticated. Authoritarian states are investing heavily in teams of opinion-shapers to flood the internet with their narratives.

This technological advantage gives authoritarian regimes a powerful edge over democracies, where the free flow of information is a cornerstone. As trust in democratic institutions declines, some citizens may become more receptive to the false promises of strongman rule. Countering this threat requires robust defenses against online manipulation and a renewed commitment to media literacy and critical thinking among the public.

Here are key examples from the context that illustrate how technology is being used by authoritarian regimes to maintain control:

• Disinformation campaigns: The context discusses how extremist groups and foreign agents can "generate products that show people—including democratic politicians—doing things they didn't do and saying things they never said" and then distribute this false information through social media targeting people based on their personal profiles.

• Exploiting social media: The context notes that "Facebook has two billion active users" and that Russia has "pioneering use of social media as a weapon" to "discredit democracy, divide Europe, weaken the transatlantic partnership, and punish governments that dare stand up to Moscow."

• Tracking and monitoring citizens: The context raises concerns about the "Big Brother" aspect of the "mountain of personal data being uploaded into social media" and how this could allow "a Fascist government" to track and target individuals who participate in protests or demonstrations.

• Creating echo chambers: The context explains how "technology has made it possible for extremist organizations to construct echo chambers of support for conspiracy theories, false narratives, and ignorant views on religion and race" by repeatedly spreading disinformation.

• Undermining trust in institutions: The context discusses how in "a rising number of countries, citizens profess a lack of faith in every public institution and the official data they produce" due to the spread of disinformation.

Cultural Resilience Against Fascism

The cultural and moral resilience of societies is a powerful force against the spread of Fascism. Throughout history, we have seen how the deep-rooted values of equality, empathy, and human dignity can serve as a bulwark against the divisive and authoritarian tendencies of Fascist ideologies.

One powerful example is the journal entries of Růžena Spieglová, an ordinary citizen living under Nazi occupation. Despite the severe oppression and discrimination she faced, Spieglová maintained a generosity of spirit, recognizing the equal worth of all people, including those of different races and religions. This capacity for compassion and belief in universal human dignity is a testament to the resilience of the human spirit in the face of Fascist brutality.

Fascism thrives on sowing division, stoking fear, and eroding the moral foundations of a society. But when a people remain steadfast in their commitment to democratic values and the inherent equality of all, they can resist the seductive but destructive pull of Fascism. This cultural resilience, rooted in shared moral principles, is a formidable defense against the rise of authoritarian, nationalist, and intolerant political movements.

Here are some examples from the context that support the key insight about the cultural resilience against Fascism:

• The journal entry from Růžena Spieglová, a widow living in Nazi-occupied Czechoslovakia in 1942, illustrates her empathy and belief that "we are all equal before God" despite the oppression she faces as a Jew. This generosity of spirit and belief in human equality is described as the "single most effective antidote to the self-centered moral numbness that allows Fascism to thrive."

• The context describes how in Italy, even after the Fascist party gained power, there were "pockets of anti-Nazi activity in the trade unions, the private sector, the religious community, and the military" that showed dissent against the regime. This demonstrates the resilience of cultural and moral values in the face of Fascist control.

• The passage notes that in Germany, while "open dissent was rare," there were still attempts to resist the Nazis, such as the failed assassination attempt on Hitler by Claus Philipp Schenk (Count von Stauffenberg) in 1944. This shows the persistence of those upholding democratic principles against the Fascist regime.

• The context describes how in Italy, even Mussolini's own Fascist party eventually turned against him in 1942-1943, with the Fascist Grand Council voting to restore the powers of the king and parliament. This internal resistance within the Fascist movement itself demonstrates the limits of Fascist control and the enduring strength of democratic institutions.

Complexity of Economic Reforms and Populism

The text highlights the complexity of economic reforms and how they can fuel the rise of populist leaders. When countries face economic challenges like high debt, inflation, and unemployment, populist figures often emerge promising quick fixes. However, their solutions frequently fail to address the root causes and instead focus on scapegoating and consolidating power.

For example, in Venezuela, the implementation of IMF-backed austerity measures led to public unrest and a crackdown by the government. This paved the way for the populist leader Hugo Chávez, who initially ran on a platform of change and championing the common people. Yet once in power, Chávez used his popularity to undermine democratic institutions and concentrate authority, rather than enacting sustainable economic reforms.

This pattern is not unique to Venezuela. Across the globe, economic hardship has fueled the ascent of populist demagogues who promise simple solutions but ultimately fail to address the complex, systemic challenges facing their countries. Effectively navigating economic reforms requires nuance, compromise, and a steadfast commitment to democratic principles - qualities that populist leaders often lack. Recognizing this dynamic is crucial for safeguarding democratic institutions and ensuring meaningful, lasting economic progress.

Here are some examples from the context that illustrate the complexity of economic reforms and populism:

• In Italy in the early 20th century, the Socialist Party gained popularity after World War I due to economic hardships, but their extremist demands to seize factories and land led to a breakdown of the economy and political instability. This created an opportunity for the rise of Benito Mussolini and the Fascist movement.

• In Hungary, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has exploited the refugee crisis to stoke fears and consolidate power, despite the fact that relatively few migrants are actually entering Hungary. Orbán has chosen to "foment paranoia" rather than work constructively with institutions to address the humanitarian crisis.

• In the Czech Republic, billionaire Andrej Babiš campaigned on fighting corruption, but is now under investigation for corruption himself. Many voters believed that because he is wealthy, he would not need to steal, illustrating how economic grievances can be manipulated by populist leaders.

• The context discusses how populist movements often arise not in response to dire economic conditions, but rather to "what they fear might be." This suggests the complexity of addressing the underlying economic issues that fuel populism.

The key terms illustrated here are:

• Economic hardships: The economic turmoil and breakdown in Italy after WWI
• Consolidation of power: How leaders like Orbán and Babiš have used populist rhetoric to concentrate power
• Manipulation of economic grievances: How populist leaders exploit voters' economic fears and frustrations

Overall, the examples highlight how the complex interplay between economic challenges and populist politics can create instability and enable the rise of authoritarian figures, rather than addressing the root economic issues.

Transformation of Nationalism

The narrative highlights the transformation of nationalism from a unifying force to a divisive tool. Historically, nationalism provided a sense of cultural identity and belonging. However, when taken to extremes, it can devolve into xenophobia - the fear and hatred of foreigners or outsiders. This extreme nationalism suppresses minority rights and can even lead to sectarian violence - conflict between different religious or ethnic groups within a society.

After the Cold War ended, the removal of Soviet control allowed long-repressed nationalist sentiments to emerge across Central Europe and the Balkans. While this enabled newly liberated states to join Western institutions, it also unleashed pent-up anger and resentment in other regions. Nationalist leaders exploited these emotions, using them to consolidate power and target minority populations. This dynamic fueled horrific conflicts, such as the Bosnian genocide, where nationalist rhetoric justified mass atrocities.

The narrative cautions that unchecked nationalism, driven by "fanatical brains," can have catastrophic consequences. Postwar institutions like the UN were established to prevent nationalist aggression from spiraling into wider wars. Yet the narrative suggests these guardrails are now being tested, as nationalist movements gain traction across Europe, undermining democratic norms and institutions. This transformation of nationalism from a unifying to a divisive force remains a potent threat to peace and human rights.

Here are examples from the context that illustrate the key insight about the transformation of nationalism:

• After World War II, the Cold War period was marked by "unceasing anxiety" as the "lingering shadow of Fascism was darkened by another kind of cloud" - the threat of nuclear war and the suppression of nationalism under Communist regimes.

• When the Cold War ended, the "Soviet bloc lost its ability to stifle the expression of nationalist attitudes" which "brought some peoples closer together and tore others apart." This led to conflicts "that had arisen almost overnight" in regions like the Balkans.

• In the Balkans, Slobodan Milošević, a Serbian leader, "exploited the anger born of past defeats" and "called for vigilance against such imagined present-day foes" to stoke Serbian nationalism. This fueled the "grisly civil war" in Bosnia-Herzegovina.

• The rise of nationalist, populist parties across Europe, like the AfD in Germany, has "given renewed hope to movements of a roughly similar ilk in all parts of Europe." These parties "make their presence known in marches and rallies, hoisting banners that advertise such sentiments as 'White Europe' and 'Refugees Out'."

• In Hungary, Prime Minister Orbán has "chosen to foment paranoia" about migrants, declaring they "endanger our way of life, our culture, our customs and our Christian traditions" despite relatively few migrants entering the country.

The context shows how nationalism, once a unifying force, was transformed into a divisive tool used by leaders to scapegoat minorities, suppress dissent, and justify violence - a dangerous shift from its more benign expressions like cultural pride.

Quotes

Let's take a look at some key quotes from "Fascism" that resonated with readers.

Hitler lied shamelessly about himself and about his enemies. He convinced millions of men and women that he cared for them deeply when, in fact, he would have willingly sacrificed them all. His murderous ambition, avowed racism, and utter immorality were given the thinnest mask, and yet millions of Germans were drawn to Hitler precisely because he seemed authentic. They screamed, “Sieg Heil” with happiness in their hearts, because they thought they were creating a better world.

A charismatic leader can deceive people with false promises and lies, convincing them that he cares about their well-being when in reality he is only interested in his own power and ambitions. Despite his true nature being immoral and harmful, people are drawn to him because he appears authentic and passionate about his cause. They become enthusiastic followers, blinded by their desire for a better world, and overlook the warning signs of his true intentions.

We cannot, of course, expect every leader to possess the wisdom of Lincoln or Mandela’s largeness of soul. But when we think about what questions might be most useful to ask, perhaps we should begin by discerning what our prospective leaders believe it worthwhile for us to hear.

Do they cater to our prejudices by suggesting that we treat people outside our ethnicity, race, creed or party as unworthy of dignity and respect?

Do they want us to nurture our anger toward those who we believe have done us wrong, rub raw our grievances and set our sights on revenge?

Do they encourage us to have contempt for our governing institutions and the electoral process?

Do they seek to destroy our faith in essential contributors to democracy, such as an independent press, and a professional judiciary?

Do they exploit the symbols of patriotism, the flag, the pledge in a conscious effort to turn us against one another?

If defeated at the polls, will they accept the verdict, or insist without evidence they have won?

Do they go beyond asking about our votes to brag about their ability to solve all problems put to rest all anxieties and satisfy every desire?

Do they solicit our cheers by speaking casually and with pumped up machismo about using violence to blow enemies away?

Do they echo the attitude of Musolini: “The crowd doesn’t have to know, all they have to do is believe and submit to being shaped.”?

Or do they invite us to join with them in building and maintaining a healthy center for our society, a place where rights and duties are apportioned fairly, the social contract is honored, and all have room to dream and grow.

The answers to these questions will not tell us whether a prospective leader is left or right-wing, conservative or liberal, or, in the American context, a Democrat or a Republican. However, they will us much that we need to know about those wanting to lead us, and much also about ourselves.

For those who cherish freedom, the answers will provide grounds for reassurance, or, a warning we dare not ignore.

When evaluating potential leaders, it's essential to scrutinize their intentions and values. Do they appeal to our biases, fuel anger, and disregard institutions, or do they promote unity, fairness, and democracy? Their responses will reveal whether they prioritize power or the people's well-being, serving as a warning or reassurance for those who value freedom.

The real question is: who has the responsibility to uphold human rights? The answer to that is: everyone.

The protection of human rights is a collective responsibility that falls on every individual. It's not just the duty of governments or institutions, but also of ordinary people to ensure that these rights are respected and upheld. Each person has a role to play in promoting and defending human dignity, regardless of their background or position. By acknowledging this shared responsibility, we can work together to create a more just and equitable society.

Chapter Notes

One: A Doctrine of Anger and Fear

• Fascism as a Doctrine of Anger and Fear: The chapter explores how Fascism emerged as a political ideology that thrived on the anger, fear, and resentment of people who felt their country and way of life were under threat. Fascism exploited these emotions to gain power and consolidate authority.

• The Impact of Fascism on the Author's Life: The author's personal experiences as a refugee fleeing Fascism in Czechoslovakia and later Communism shaped their perspective on the dangers of authoritarian regimes and the importance of democracy and freedom.

• The Rise and Fall of Communism: The chapter describes the author's observations of the collapse of Communist regimes in Eastern Europe in the late 1980s and early 1990s, and the subsequent hopes for a new era of democracy and international cooperation.

• The Threat of Fascism in the Modern Era: The author argues that the election of Donald Trump in the United States has reignited concerns about the resurgence of Fascist tendencies, as Trump's rhetoric and actions have undermined democratic institutions and values.

• The Characteristics of Fascism: The chapter outlines the key characteristics of Fascism, including its emphasis on nationalism, authoritarianism, anti-democratic sentiment, the use of violence, and the exploitation of fear and resentment among the population.

• The Role of Technology in Fascist Consolidation of Power: The chapter discusses how modern technology, particularly the internet and social media, can be used by Fascist leaders to control information, spread disinformation, and monitor and target citizens, posing a threat to democratic freedoms.

• The Distinction between Fascism and Related Concepts: The chapter explores the differences between Fascism and other forms of authoritarian rule, such as totalitarianism, dictatorship, and tyranny, emphasizing that Fascism is characterized by its specific tactics of mobilizing the masses and its willingness to use violence to achieve its goals.

• The Historical Context of Fascism's Rise: The chapter provides historical context for the emergence of Fascism in the early 20th century, including the intellectual and social upheaval caused by the Industrial Revolution, the aftermath of World War I, and the failure of democratic idealism to address the needs of the masses.

Two: The Greatest Show on Earth

• Benito Mussolini's Early Life and Radicalization: Mussolini was born in a small farming town in Italy in 1883. He had a rebellious youth, often getting into fights and trouble at school. He was influenced by his father's socialist beliefs and his mother's patience, which shaped his later political views and actions.

• Mussolini's Transformation from Socialist to Fascist: Mussolini initially embraced socialist and anti-war views, but in 1914 he suddenly shifted to supporting Italy's entry into World War I. This may have been due to financial incentives from French business interests or his own changing ideological beliefs.

• The Rise of Fascism in Italy: After the war, Italy faced significant social and economic turmoil, with the Socialist Party gaining power and workers and peasants engaging in protests and unrest. Mussolini capitalized on this instability, forming the Fascist movement and using violence and intimidation to drive out the Socialists and seize power.

• Mussolini's Consolidation of Power: Once in power, Mussolini quickly moved to consolidate his control, abolishing all competing political parties, eliminating freedom of the press, and taking control of the national police and other institutions. He also sought to align with the Catholic Church and promote a nationalist, authoritarian vision for Italy.

• Mussolini's Governance and Propaganda: Mussolini sought to present himself as a strong, decisive leader who could bring order and prosperity to Italy. He implemented some reforms, such as improving infrastructure and social services, but also relied heavily on propaganda, theatrics, and the suppression of dissent to maintain his power.

• Mussolini's Foreign Policy and Expansionism: Mussolini pursued an aggressive foreign policy, seeking to expand Italy's influence and territory, including the invasion of Ethiopia. He used this expansionism as a way to rally support and distract from domestic challenges.

• Mussolini's Limitations as a Leader: Despite his success in consolidating power, Mussolini struggled as a diplomat and economist, making poor decisions that undermined Italy's economic and international standing. He also became increasingly isolated and reliant on his own instincts, rather than seeking advice from capable advisers.

Three: “We Want to Be Barbarians”

• Adolf Hitler's Rise to Power: Hitler joined the small German Workers' Party in 1919 and quickly rose to become its leader. He used his skills as a mesmerizing orator to attract new members and expand the party's influence, renaming it the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazis).

• The Enabling Law and the Destruction of German Democracy: In 1933, Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany and used the Enabling Law to consolidate power, abolishing local assemblies, purging the civil service, and suppressing political opponents through violence and intimidation.

• Hitler's Manipulation of the German People: Hitler was skilled at reading and manipulating crowds, reducing complex issues to simple terms and presenting himself as a champion of the common people. He used propaganda, including the widespread use of radio, to spread his message and cultivate an image of authenticity.

• Rearmament and Aggression: While publicly claiming peaceful intentions, Hitler secretly rearmed Germany in preparation for war, taking steps like remilitarizing the Rhineland in 1936. He saw himself as a "world historical figure" destined to transform the age through the power of his will.

• The Night of the Long Knives: In 1934, Hitler eliminated the Sturmabteilung (SA), the Nazi paramilitary force, in the "Night of the Long Knives" to secure the loyalty of the regular army and consolidate his power.

• The Weimar Republic's Downfall: The Weimar Republic, Germany's post-World War I democratic government, faced numerous challenges, including the harsh terms of the Versailles Treaty, hyperinflation, and political instability, which paved the way for Hitler's rise to power.

• Hitler's Charisma and Deception: Despite his lack of formal education and unathletic appearance, Hitler was able to captivate audiences through his charismatic oratory and his ability to project an image of authenticity, even as he lied shamelessly about himself and his intentions.

Four: “Close Your Hearts to Pity”

• Similarities and Differences between Hitler and Mussolini: Despite their similarities in height, build, and mustache, as well as their shared rhetoric of daring, nationalism, anti-Communism, and war, Mussolini rejected Hitler's racial theories and did not feel compelled to conduct the same level of domestic purges as Hitler.

• Mussolini's Ego and Failures: Mussolini's ego and belief in his own instincts led him to take on too many cabinet positions and make poor decisions in preparing Italy for war. He overestimated Italy's military capabilities and underestimated the challenges of modern warfare.

• Mussolini's Invasion of Greece: Mussolini's decision to invade Greece in 1940, contrary to the warnings of his own generals and without informing his German ally, was a disastrous failure that forced Hitler to delay the invasion of the Soviet Union.

• The Spanish Civil War: The Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) was a proxy conflict between the forces of democracy and Fascism, with the Republican forces receiving support from international volunteers and the Soviet Union, while Franco's Nationalist forces were aided by Hitler and Mussolini. The conflict was marked by atrocities on both sides and the failure of the Republican factions to coalesce.

• Franco's Relationship with Hitler and Mussolini: Despite pressure from Hitler and Mussolini, the Spanish general Franco resisted their demands for bold actions, instead waging a cautious, deliberative war. When Hitler urged him to bring Spain into the Axis alliance, Franco refused and set his own terms, which the Germans viewed as exorbitant.

Five: Victory of the Caesars

• Aftermath of World War I in Hungary: After World War I, the Austro-Hungarian Empire was dismantled, and two-thirds of Hungary was amputated and parceled out to neighboring states. This led to widespread poverty, dissatisfaction, and a desire to recover the lost territories among the Hungarian population.

• Rise of Fascist Organizations in Hungary: In the interwar period, several Fascist organizations arose in Hungary, most prominently the Arrow Cross, which preached a doctrine called "Hungarism" that promised jobs, revenge, freedom from foreigners, and the restoration of lost territories. By 1939, the Arrow Cross was the largest right-wing party in Hungary.

• Fascism in Other European Countries: While Fascist movements emerged in various European countries, such as Spain, Portugal, France, and Romania, they were often contained or diluted before they could threaten the powerful. Only in Italy and Germany did former corporals (Mussolini and Hitler) manage to seize power.

• Fascism and Czechoslovakia: The case of Czechoslovakia was unique, as Konrad Henlein, a Fascist leader within the country's German community, collaborated with the Nazis and helped justify Hitler's annexation of Czechoslovak territory through his fabrications about the mistreatment of ethnic Germans.

• Fascist Influences Beyond Europe: Fascist ideas and movements were not limited to Europe. In India, Hindu nationalist leaders admired Mussolini's attempts to transform Italy and sought a similar transformation among their own followers. In the United States, the Silver Legion of America and the German American Bund (GAB) were examples of Fascist-inspired organizations.

• Fascism's Appeal and Motivations: Fascism appealed to many people because it offered hope, excitement, and a sense of belonging to those who had despaired of political change. Individuals joined Fascist movements for various reasons, including ambition, greed, and hatred, often denying or being unaware of their true motives.

• Fascism as Part of Humanity: The chapter suggests that Fascism should not be dismissed as an exception to humanity, but rather as a part of it. Even those who enlisted in Fascist movements were often driven by a desire for hope, optimism, and a sense of participating in a transformative historical movement.

Six: The Fall

Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

• Empathy and Equality as Antidotes to Fascism: The chapter highlights the capacity of ordinary people, like Růžena Spieglová, to feel empathy towards others and believe in the fundamental equality of all humans, even in the face of extraordinary stress and oppression. This generosity of spirit is presented as the most effective antidote to the self-centered moral numbness that allows Fascism to thrive.

• The Resilience of the British People: The chapter describes the resilience and adaptability of the British people during the Blitz, as they continued to defy the Nazi onslaught and refused to yield, despite the heavy bombing and destruction. This resilience and will to resist played a crucial role in frustrating Hitler's aggressive schemes.

• The Invasion of the Soviet Union and the Turning Point of the War: The chapter explains how Hitler's decision to invade the Soviet Union in June 1941, with the hope of disrupting the local population's food supply, ultimately proved to be a strategic blunder. The Red Army's ability to rally and establish strong defensive positions, coupled with the challenges posed by distance and climate, led to the slowing of the German momentum and the eventual turning point of the war.

• The Limitations of Totalitarian Control: The chapter highlights the gap between the theory and reality of Fascist regimes, noting that neither Mussolini nor Hitler could engineer a fully totalitarian state. It describes the Gestapo's struggles to maintain the illusion of omnipresent control, as well as the pockets of anti-Nazi activity that persisted in Germany and the resilience of leftist movements in Italy.

• The Fall of Mussolini: The chapter details the pivotal moment when Mussolini's own party turned against him, leading to his downfall and the collapse of Fascism in Italy. It describes Mussolini's growing erratic behavior, the Italian public's waning support for the war, and the king's decision to accept Mussolini's resignation, which sparked celebrations throughout Italy.

• The Decline of Hitler and the Exposure of Nazi Atrocities: The chapter chronicles the physical and mental decline of Hitler, as well as the unraveling of the "Hitler myth" that had sustained the German people. It describes how the Allies' advances and the liberation of concentration camps exposed the horrors of the Nazi regime, shattering the illusion of Hitler's invincibility.

• The Enduring Power of Humanity's Resilience and Compassion: The chapter concludes with a reference to the closing scene of Charlie Chaplin's "The Great Dictator," in which the humble Jewish barber delivers a powerful message about the resilience of the human spirit and the importance of liberty, compassion, and the rejection of hatred and oppression. This serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring power of these values, even in the face of the most formidable challenges.

Seven: Dictatorship of Democracy

• Similarities and Differences between Fascism and Communism: Both Fascism and Communism were totalitarian ideologies that rejected democracy and individual rights. However, Fascism was based on nationalism and race, while Communism was based on class struggle. Fascists persecuted Jews and Roma, while Communists targeted the bourgeoisie and landowners.

• Stalin vs. Hitler: Despite their differences, Stalin and Hitler shared a common language of violence. Both despised democratic ideals and struck ruthlessly at their enemies. Stalin was more hands-on and efficient, while Hitler was more indolent and delegated more to others.

• Communists' Efforts to Indoctrinate the Masses: The Communists used propaganda, coercion, and the threat of violence to mold their citizens into conformists who would obey the government's demands without question. They sought to create a "new man" who would prioritize the collective over individual interests.

• The Takeover of Czechoslovakia: In 1948, the Communists in Czechoslovakia, backed by the Soviet Union, were able to seize power through a combination of political maneuvering, intimidation, and the resignation of democratic ministers. This event marked the beginning of the Cold War in Europe.

• The Rise of McCarthyism: Senator Joseph McCarthy's reckless and unsubstantiated accusations of Communist infiltration in the U.S. government and other institutions led to a widespread climate of fear and the ruination of many innocent lives. This episode highlighted the dangers of demagoguery and the power of repeating lies.

• The Complexities of the Cold War: While the Cold War was often portrayed as a clear-cut struggle between democracy and Communism, the reality was more nuanced. Some democratic governments, in their zeal to oppose Communism, were willing to overlook repression and human rights abuses in their anti-Communist allies.

• The Importance of Upholding Democratic Values: The chapter emphasizes that mere anti-Communism is not enough for a government to earn respect. Governments must strive to uphold democratic principles and individual rights, rather than settling for being "barely good enough."

Eight: “There Are a Lot of Bodies Up There”

Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

• Nationalism as a Double-Edged Sword: Nationalism can be a source of pride and cultural identity, but it can also lead to resentment, hatred, and aggression towards others when taken to an extreme. The chapter highlights how unbridled nationalism was a key factor behind the aggression of Fascist regimes like Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and militaristic Japan, leading to devastating global conflicts.

• The Dangers of Unresolved Ethnic Tensions: The chapter examines how the unresolved ethnic tensions and nationalist sentiments in the Balkans, particularly in Bosnia and Kosovo, led to horrific violence and genocide in the 1990s. The Bosnian War and the Kosovo conflict demonstrated how pent-up forces of sectarian anger can erupt when given the opportunity.

• The Limits of National Sovereignty: The chapter discusses how the international community's view of national sovereignty evolved after the atrocities of World War II and the Holocaust. It highlights the establishment of institutions like the United Nations and the principle that governments cannot commit egregious human rights violations against their own citizens without facing consequences.

• The Importance of Diplomacy and Compromise: The chapter illustrates the challenges faced by diplomats like Madeleine Albright in trying to broker peace agreements and find compromises between warring factions, such as in the case of the Kosovo conflict. It shows how even seemingly intractable conflicts can be resolved through patient diplomacy and a willingness to find common ground.

• The Promise and Perils of the Post-Cold War Era: The chapter discusses the "third make-or-break opportunity of the twentieth century" that arose with the end of the Cold War, highlighting the potential for greater global cooperation and the advancement of democracy, human rights, and international institutions. However, it also cautions that the new era brought its own set of challenges, such as the resurgence of nationalist and sectarian conflicts.

• The Role of the United States in Shaping the Post-Cold War World: The chapter emphasizes the active role played by the United States, under the Clinton administration, in promoting democracy, human rights, and international cooperation in the aftermath of the Cold War. This included efforts to address conflicts in the Balkans, safeguard nuclear materials, ban chemical weapons, and encourage economic liberalization in China and India.

Nine: A Difficult Art

• Democracy Requires More Than Elections: Democracy is not just about choosing leaders through elections, but also respecting the rights of the minority, defending constitutional protections, and ensuring that leaders do not abuse their power.

• Challenges Facing Democracy: Many countries are facing challenges such as high unemployment, economic stagnation, and the disruptive impact of technology, which can lead to a loss of faith in democratic institutions and a rise in support for authoritarian alternatives.

• Disinformation and Social Media: The spread of disinformation and fake news through social media platforms is a significant threat to democracy, as it can undermine public trust in institutions and make it harder for leaders to communicate effectively with citizens.

• The Importance of Civic Engagement: Citizens have a responsibility to engage with the democratic process and hold their leaders accountable, rather than simply complaining or retreating into cynicism when they are dissatisfied with the performance of their government.

• The Ongoing Threat of Authoritarianism: There are ongoing efforts by authoritarian leaders and movements to undermine democracy, often through incremental and subtle means, such as changing constitutions, attacking the free press, and dehumanizing minority groups.

• The Role of International Support: Organizations like the National Democratic Institute (NDI) play an important role in supporting the development of democratic institutions and practices in countries around the world, by sharing best practices and providing practical assistance.

• The Enduring Value of Democracy: Despite its flaws and challenges, democracy remains the best system of government, as it provides a means for citizens to hold their leaders accountable and to remedy the shortcomings of the system through open debate and the selection of new leaders.

Ten: President for Life

• Hugo Chávez's Rise to Power: Chávez, a young Venezuelan military officer, attempted a coup in 1992 but failed. He was later released from prison and entered politics, running for and winning the Venezuelan presidency in 1998 on a platform of change and championing the poor.

• Chávez's Consolidation of Power: Once in office, Chávez moved quickly to consolidate his power, holding a referendum to draft a new constitution that extended the presidential term and gave him control over the military. He also vilified his political opponents, using rhetoric to divide the country.

• Chávez's Populist Policies: Chávez implemented populist policies, such as oil-financed social programs to help the poor, which initially made him popular. However, he failed to address the country's underlying economic challenges, leading to mismanagement and waste.

• Attempted Coup and Chávez's Return: In 2002, the political opposition attempted to remove Chávez from power through a coup, but he was able to regain control with the help of loyal military forces. This event solidified Chávez's grip on power and his image as a champion of the people.

• Chávez's Authoritarian Tendencies: Over time, Chávez exhibited increasingly authoritarian tendencies, such as packing the judiciary, silencing dissent, and creating a private security force to intimidate opponents. He also used the media to promote his image and agenda.

• Chávez's Legacy and Venezuela's Decline: While Chávez brought significant change to Venezuela, his policies ultimately led to economic decline, rising crime, and a deterioration of democratic institutions. His successor, Nicolás Maduro, has continued down a similar path, further exacerbating the country's crisis.

• The Lure of Populist Leaders: The chapter suggests that the Venezuelan experience demonstrates how the lure of a charismatic, populist leader can be hard to resist when economic and social conditions deteriorate, and democratic politicians fail to address the needs of the people.

Eleven: Erdoğan the Magnificent

• Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's Rise to Power: Erdoğan, the mayor of Istanbul, was arrested in 1997 for inciting religious hatred, which gave him notoriety and made him a hero to some. This incident occurred during a time when the Turkish government was seeking to keep religion out of the public square, but a sputtering economy and bickering politicians had generated popular frustration, leading to the rise of Islamist political parties like the Justice and Development Party (AKP), which Erdoğan founded in 2001.

• Kemalist Secularism and the Struggle for Democracy: Turkey's founding father, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, had sought to create a fully modern, secular society, abolishing the Islamic caliphate and other religious institutions. This led to a tension between the secular state and the devout Muslim population, with the military often intervening to preserve Atatürk's legacy. Erdoğan and the AKP represented a departure from this Kemalist tradition, seeking to bring religion back into the public sphere.

• Erdoğan's Pragmatic Approach and Economic Reforms: When Erdoğan became prime minister in 2003, he initially focused on pragmatic economic reforms, stabilizing the economy, attracting foreign investment, and improving infrastructure and social services. This helped the AKP gain widespread popular support, even among the secular middle class.

• Consolidation of Power and Authoritarian Tendencies: As Erdoğan's power grew, he began to take steps to transform the institutions that posed a threat to his future, using Atatürk's heavy-handed methods to chip away at the structures his predecessor had forged. This included arresting and trying military officers, tightening the AKP's grip on the press, and proposing legislation to expand the courts and his ability to appoint loyal judges.

• Polarization and the Attempted Coup: Erdoğan's increasingly polarizing rhetoric and actions, such as his efforts to roll back women's rights and promote a "pious generation," led to protests and unrest, culminating in the failed coup attempt in 2016. Erdoğan used the coup as a pretext to purge his opponents and consolidate even more power, declaring a state of emergency and jailing thousands of people.

• Erdoğan's Vision for a Powerful Presidency: Erdoğan's desire for a strong, presidential system led him to push for a referendum in 2017 that abolished the office of prime minister and transferred significant powers to the presidency. This further diminished the practical restraints on Erdoğan's authority.

• Strained Relations with the West and Domestic Divisions: Erdoğan's confrontational approach to the West, his crackdown on dissent, and his efforts to reshape Turkish identity have strained Turkey's relationships with Europe and the United States. Domestically, the country remains deeply divided, with Erdoğan's supporters in the countryside and his opponents in the major cities and along the Aegean coast.

• Challenges to Turkey's Democratic Future: The chapter suggests that Erdoğan has the opportunity to mend Turkey's democracy by moving away from recrimination and toward dialogue, heeding criticism from moderates, and ceasing to equate legitimate political opposition with treason. However, the primary obstacle may be Erdoğan's own belief that he alone knows what's best for Turkey, which could lead him further down the path of tyranny.

Twelve: Man from the KGB

• Vladimir Putin's Background and Rise to Power: Putin was born in 1952 and his parents survived the Siege of Leningrad during World War II. He joined the KGB as a young man and was in East Germany when the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, which shattered the political and ideological system he had dedicated his life to. After the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991, Putin began working for the mayor of St. Petersburg and later rose to become the president of Russia.

• Putin's Worldview and Approach to Governance: Putin's worldview was shaped by the Cold War, and he seeks to restore Russia's greatness and influence on the global stage. As president, he has consolidated power, cracked down on opposition, and used tactics like disinformation and election interference to maintain his grip on power. He portrays himself as the face of the entire Russian nation and has used nationalism as a rallying cry.

• Russia's Transition to a Market Economy and Democracy: The transition from a centralized Soviet system to a market economy and democracy in the 1990s was chaotic and difficult for Russia. The economy shrank by more than half, and many Russians struggled with the changes. Putin has used the perceived failures of this period to discredit democratic institutions and accuse the West of trying to undermine Russia.

• Putin's Relationship with the West: Putin is distrustful of the West, particularly the United States, and accuses them of trying to encircle and weaken Russia. He has been aggressive in foreign policy, including the annexation of Crimea and support for separatists in eastern Ukraine. This has strained relations between Russia and the West and led to increased tensions.

• Putin's Manipulation of Information and Media: Putin has tightened control over the media in Russia, turning television networks into propaganda outlets. He has also used tactics like hacking, the dissemination of fake news, and the creation of false social media accounts to influence elections and sow discord in the West.

• The Danger of Putin as a Model for Other Autocratic Leaders: The author argues that Putin's consolidation of power and use of tactics to undermine democracy could serve as a model for other leaders who want to retain power indefinitely, despite political and legal constraints. This poses a threat to the spread of democracy globally.

Thirteen: “We Are Who We Were”

• Orbán's Rise to Power: Viktor Orbán, a youthful football enthusiast with a raven-colored beard, emerged as a prominent voice for freedom in Hungary during the end of the Cold War. However, his political trajectory has been controversial, as he has transitioned from a pro-democracy advocate to a champion of "illiberal democracy" and nationalist policies.

• Orbán's "Illiberal Democracy": Orbán's vision of "illiberal democracy" prioritizes the supposed needs of the majority over the inalienable rights of individuals and minorities. This approach has led to the consolidation of power by Orbán's Fidesz party, the weakening of democratic institutions, and the suppression of dissent and independent media.

• Nationalism and Ethnic Pride in Hungary: Orbán's political agenda is heavily influenced by a nationalist narrative that emphasizes Hungarian ethnic identity, history, and pride. He has exploited grievances over the 1920 Treaty of Trianon, which cost Hungary two-thirds of its territory, and has sought to extend citizenship and political influence to ethnic Hungarians living outside the country.

• Orbán's Conflict with the EU: Orbán's nationalist and anti-EU rhetoric has put him at odds with the European Union, which has criticized his policies as undermining democratic norms and values. Orbán has accused the EU of meddling in Hungary's affairs and has sought to rally domestic support by portraying the conflict as a struggle for Hungarian sovereignty.

• The Rise of Nationalism in Poland: The Law and Justice Party (PiS) in Poland, led by Jarosław Kaczyński, has also pursued a nationalist agenda, seeking to consolidate power and undermine democratic institutions. Kaczyński's disdain for former Communists and his suspicion of foreign influence, particularly from Russia and Germany, have fueled his party's nationalist rhetoric and actions.

• The Challenges of European Integration: The chapter explores the tensions between the pragmatic economic and political benefits of European integration and the growing nationalist and anti-immigrant sentiment among some European citizens. The top-down nature of the European project and the perceived loss of national sovereignty have contributed to a cooling of enthusiasm for the European project in some parts of the continent.

• Immigration and the Rise of Populism: The influx of immigrants, particularly from the Middle East and North Africa, has become a major political issue in Europe, fueling the rise of populist and nationalist movements that capitalize on fears of cultural and demographic change. Parties like the AfD in Germany and the National Front in France have gained traction by portraying immigration as a threat to national identity and security.

• The Dangers of Nationalism and Xenophobia: The chapter warns against the resurgence of nationalist and xenophobic ideologies in Europe, drawing parallels to the jingoistic nationalism that led to the rise of Fascism in the 20th century. It emphasizes the importance of upholding democratic values, respecting minority rights, and fostering a sense of shared European identity to counter the divisive forces of extreme nationalism.

Fourteen: “The Leader Will Always Be with Us”

• Korea's Tumultuous History: Korea has a long history of being a unified country, but has also endured periods of external attacks, occupation, and division. The 20th century saw the country divided into North and South Korea after World War II, with the North becoming a totalitarian regime under Kim Il-sung.

• North Korea's Founding and Kim Il-sung's Rise to Power: Kim Il-sung, a Soviet-backed military officer, became the head of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) in 1948. He built a cult of personality around himself and his family, and used nationalist rhetoric and fear of external enemies to justify the DPRK's totalitarian rule.

• The Korean War and its Aftermath: The Korean War (1950-1953) was a devastating conflict that ended in a stalemate, with no clear victor. The DPRK built its narrative around the claim that it was the victim of American aggression, which it used to justify its militaristic policies and totalitarian rule.

• The Juche Ideology and North Korean Indoctrination: The DPRK developed the Juche ideology of self-reliance, which it used to justify its isolation from the outside world and its dependence on foreign aid. The regime also indoctrinated its citizens from a young age, removing them from their families and filling their minds with party dogma.

• The Transition of Power in North Korea: Power in the DPRK has been passed down from Kim Il-sung to his son Kim Jong-il and then to his grandson Kim Jong-un, creating a family dynasty that has ruled the country since its founding.

• North Korea's Economic Struggles and the Famine of the 1990s: The collapse of the Soviet Union and the loss of foreign aid led to economic hardship in North Korea, culminating in a devastating famine in the 1990s that killed an estimated 5% of the population.

• North Korea's Nuclear and Missile Programs: In the face of economic and diplomatic isolation, North Korea has invested heavily in developing nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, which it sees as a deterrent against external threats and a way to maintain its regime's power.

• Diplomatic Efforts and Missed Opportunities: The United States and the international community have made various diplomatic efforts to address North Korea's nuclear program, including the Agreed Framework in the 1990s and the failed attempt by the Clinton administration to negotiate a deal in 2000. However, these efforts have often been hampered by North Korea's intransigence and the shifting priorities of successive U.S. administrations.

• The Challenges of Dealing with North Korea: North Korea's totalitarian regime, its reliance on nationalist rhetoric and the cult of personality, and its pursuit of nuclear weapons make it a uniquely difficult and dangerous adversary for the international community. Efforts to influence the regime through diplomatic, economic, or military means have had limited success.

• The Human Rights Abuses in North Korea: The DPRK is a repressive regime that systematically violates the human rights of its citizens, including through the use of political prisons, torture, public executions, and the denial of basic freedoms. The regime's control over its population is pervasive and all-encompassing.

Fifteen: President of the United States

• The United States as a Beacon of Hope: The United States has historically been seen as a beacon of hope and a source of inspiration for those seeking liberty and freedom around the world. This reputation has been a powerful force in shaping the country's identity and role on the global stage.

• Admiration for Autocrats: President Trump has expressed admiration for various autocratic leaders, such as Rodrigo Duterte, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, and Vladimir Putin, despite their human rights abuses and disregard for democratic institutions. This stance undermines the United States' traditional role as a champion of democracy and human rights.

• Undermining Democratic Institutions: President Trump's persistent criticism of U.S. institutions, such as the courts, the FBI, and the media, has the potential to undermine public trust in these essential pillars of democracy, both domestically and internationally. This can embolden other authoritarian leaders to discredit and suppress independent institutions in their own countries.

• Retreat from Global Leadership: The "America First" approach advocated by the Trump administration, with its emphasis on narrow national interests and disregard for international cooperation, has led to a perceived retreat of the United States from its traditional role as a global leader. This has created a vacuum that other powers, such as China, are eager to fill.

• Erosion of Soft Power: The decline in global respect and trust for the United States under the Trump administration has resulted in a significant erosion of the country's "soft power" – its ability to influence and shape global events through the appeal of its values, culture, and diplomacy. This weakens the United States' ability to effectively promote its interests and ideals on the world stage.

• Potential for Increased Instability: The author expresses concern that the Trump administration's actions and rhetoric could contribute to a return to the international climate of the 1920s and 1930s, when the withdrawal of the United States from global affairs and the rise of nationalist, isolationist policies paved the way for the growth of Fascism and the outbreak of World War II. This raises the specter of increased global instability and the potential for conflict.

• Importance of Principled Foreign Policy: The chapter emphasizes the importance of the United States upholding its principles of democracy, human rights, and international cooperation, even in the face of its own imperfections. The author argues that the country's responsibility to promote these values globally outweighs concerns about its own moral standing, as a failure to do so can have far-reaching and detrimental consequences.

Sixteen: Bad Dreams

Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

• Populism is not inherently Fascist or anti-democratic: Populism is a belief in the rights, wisdom, and virtues of the common people. It has been a part of American politics since the country's founding, and many presidents have used populist rhetoric. Portraying populism as inherently Fascist or intolerant is an oversimplification.

• Fascism requires both a popular base and wealthy backers: Fascism needs the support of the masses, but it also requires the financial resources and ambition of elites to succeed. Fascist movements often start with a seemingly minor character who gains power by exploiting social and economic grievances.

• Fascism often takes hold gradually: Fascism rarely makes a dramatic entrance. Instead, it advances through a series of small, incremental steps that are often rationalized or overlooked until it is too late. This gradual process makes Fascism difficult to recognize and stop.

• The United States is not immune to Fascism: The chapter presents three hypothetical "nightmares" that illustrate how Fascism could potentially take root in the U.S. through the erosion of democratic institutions and the exploitation of social and economic divisions.

• Lack of trust and effective mechanisms for addressing grievances is a concern: The chapter notes that the lack of broadly respected leaders and the tendency of people to live in ideological bubbles make it easier for demagogues to gain traction by exploiting social and economic grievances.

• The decline of a shared media landscape is a vulnerability: The fragmentation of the media landscape, with people getting news from a wide range of often unreliable sources, makes it harder to maintain a common understanding of reality and shared civic norms.

• Complacency and inaction by political leaders could enable Fascism: The chapter suggests that the failure of political leaders to address national needs and work across party lines could create an opening for a Fascist movement to gain a foothold.

• The current political climate is a cause for concern: The chapter expresses a sense of unease about the growing hostility and disconnection in American society, which could make the country more susceptible to the rise of Fascism under the right circumstances.

Seventeen: The Right Questions

• The Tension Between Freedom and Obedience: The chapter explores the human desire for both liberty and being told what to do, highlighting the delicate balance that leaders must strike between instilling discipline and allowing creativity and curiosity to flourish.

• The Allure of Decisive Leadership: The chapter notes that in times of uncertainty or crisis, people often prefer strong and decisive leaders, even if they are wrong, over those who are more cautious and deliberative. This can pave the way for the rise of demagogues and authoritarian figures.

• The Dangers of Fascism: The chapter defines Fascism as a political ideology that claims to speak for an entire nation or group, disregards the rights of others, and is willing to use violence to achieve its goals. It argues that Fascism poses a growing threat to international freedom, prosperity, and peace.

• The Influence of Trump and Other Authoritarian Leaders: The chapter identifies Donald Trump as the first anti-democratic president in modern U.S. history, and discusses how his behavior and policies have emboldened other authoritarian leaders around the world, creating a "herd mentality" that undermines democratic norms.

• The Importance of Asking the Right Questions: The chapter suggests that we, as democratic citizens, may have been remiss in forming the right questions when evaluating potential leaders. It provides a list of questions that can help discern whether a leader is committed to democratic values or is more inclined towards authoritarianism.

• Lessons from Lincoln and Mandela: The chapter highlights the examples of Abraham Lincoln and Nelson Mandela, who fought against injustice and oppression without becoming monsters themselves. It suggests that we should seek leaders who can emulate their wisdom, courage, and commitment to democratic principles.

• The Resilience of Democracy: Despite the challenges facing democracy, the chapter argues that by many objective measures, the world is in better shape than it has ever been. It suggests that we may have lost patience with democracy's slow pace and been manipulated by those who promise quick fixes, when in reality, the foundations of democracy remain strong.

Discussion

What do you think of "Fascism"? Share your thoughts with the community below.