by Robert M. Sapolsky

Troy Shu
Troy Shu
Updated at: May 29, 2024

Explore the complex world of human behavior with this holistic book summary. Discover the dual nature of violence, the importance of interdisciplinary thinking, and the influence of early development. Get actionable insights to apply the book's learnings.

What are the big ideas?

Holistic Approach to Human Behavior

The book advocates for a holistic approach, encouraging consideration of biological, psychological, and cultural factors together rather than isolated, categorical explanations for complex human behaviors like aggression and cooperation.

Ambiguity and Dual Nature of Violence

Violence is portrayed as both destructively aggressive and potentially altruistic, emphasizing its dual nature and the contextual dependence that complicates our understanding of violent actions.

Interdisciplinary Importance

The author stresses the importance of interdisciplinary thinking, integrating insights from various disciplines to grasp the full spectrum of factors influencing human behavior.

Behavioral Complexity and Subtypes

The book delves into the complexity of defining and categorizing behaviors like aggression and empathy, highlighting the challenges posed by the varied subtypes and their context-dependent interpretations.

Influence of Early Development and Environment

It explains how early childhood experiences and environmental factors play a pivotal role in shaping adult behavior, emphasizing the long-term effects of these influences.

Biological and Environmental Interplay

The interaction between biological predispositions and environmental contexts is explored, demonstrating how this interplay affects behaviors and the emergence of traits over time.

Want to read ebooks, websites, and other text 3X faster?

From a SwiftRead user:
Feels like I just discovered the equivalent of fire but for reading text. WOW, WOW, WOW. A must have for me, forever.

Holistic Approach to Human Behavior

The book argues for a holistic approach to understanding human behavior. Rather than relying on isolated, categorical explanations from different disciplines, the author emphasizes the need to consider the interconnected biological, psychological, and cultural factors that shape complex behaviors like aggression and cooperation.

The key insight is that any single explanation, whether it's about genes, hormones, childhood experiences, or cultural influences, inherently invokes all of these factors. They are inextricably linked, with each level of explanation building upon and influencing the others. Trying to neatly compartmentalize the causes of behavior into distinct disciplinary "buckets" oversimplifies the reality.

Instead, the book advocates a more comprehensive perspective. Each type of explanation, whether neurobiological, developmental, or evolutionary, represents the culmination of the myriad influences that came before it. Recognizing this interconnectedness is crucial for grasping the true complexity of human behavior.

Human behavior is messy and multifaceted. Simplistic, categorical thinking fails to capture this nuance. The holistic approach championed in the book encourages readers to consider the full, dynamic context that shapes our actions, rather than relying on reductive explanations. This, the author argues, is essential for truly understanding the biology of our best and worst behaviors.

Here are examples from the context that support the key insight of a holistic approach to understanding human behavior:

  • The book emphasizes that behaviors cannot be explained by a single factor like "a hormone/gene/childhood event", but rather are the "end product of the influences that preceded it" across multiple disciplines. As stated, "any given type of explanation is the end product of the influences that preceded it."

  • The context contrasts the narrow focus of behaviorism on universal rules of stimulus-response, versus the ethological approach that emphasizes the "variety of behavior" and the need to observe animals in their natural contexts to understand them. This illustrates the importance of considering multiple factors beyond just universal laws.

  • The "three metaphorical layers" of the brain - the ancient regulatory layer, the emotional mammalian layer, and the cognitive neocortical layer - are described as deeply intertwined, where activity in one layer influences the others. This demonstrates the interconnected nature of biological, emotional, and cognitive factors.

  • The discussion of how humans belong to "multiple hierarchies" with "specialized ranking systems" and "internal standards" beyond just physical dominance, shows the complexity of social and cultural factors shaping human behavior beyond just biological drives.

  • The examples of the wife's passive-aggressive response to the rude driver, and the mass killings in Indonesia, illustrate how uniquely human behaviors can arise from the interaction of biological, psychological, and cultural influences.

Ambiguity and Dual Nature of Violence

Violence is a double-edged sword. It can be used to harm and destroy, but also to protect and save. The same physical act - pulling a trigger, touching someone - can be either a malicious attack or a heroic defense, depending on the context. This ambiguity is what makes violence so challenging to understand.

We have a complex, even contradictory, relationship with violence. We condemn it in some situations, yet celebrate it in others. We pay to watch violent sports, teach our children to fight back, and use military metaphors in everyday speech. This reveals the dual nature of violence - it is not inherently good or bad, but rather defined by how and why it is used.

The context in which violence occurs is paramount. An act that is abhorrent in one situation may be laudable in another. It is this profound context-dependence that makes violence so difficult to categorize simply as "good" or "evil." We must examine the nuances and motivations behind each violent act to truly understand its nature and implications.

Here are examples from the context that support the key insight about the ambiguity and dual nature of violence:

  • The context describes how violence can be seen as both "hideous aggression" and "self-sacrificing love" depending on the context. This highlights the ambiguity and dual nature of violence.

  • The example of the author's wife throwing a grape lollipop at the rude driver illustrates how violence can take subtle, passive-aggressive forms, rather than just physical acts. This shows the varied and ambiguous nature of violence.

  • The discussion of "hot-blooded" vs "cold-blooded" violence, and how some violence is done "for pleasure", further demonstrates the different forms violence can take and the complexity in understanding it.

  • The passage notes how we "pay good money to watch [violence] in a stadium" and "feel proud" when engaging in it, yet also "hate and fear the wrong kind of violence." This highlights the dual and contextual nature of how we view and respond to violence.

  • The example of the mass killings in Indonesia after the 1960s coup is contrasted with the author's personal experience of his wife's passive-aggressive act. This juxtaposition illustrates the wide spectrum of violent behaviors, from the extreme to the mundane.

Key terms and concepts:

  • Hot-blooded vs. cold-blooded violence: Violence that is emotional/reactive vs. instrumental/premeditated.
  • Passive-aggressive violence: Subtle, indirect forms of aggression like the grape lollipop example.
  • Contextual dependence: The idea that the same behavior can be seen as either good or bad depending on the circumstances.

Interdisciplinary Importance

The key insight is that interdisciplinary thinking is essential for understanding complex human behaviors. Rather than relying on a single disciplinary lens, the author advocates for integrating insights from diverse fields - from neurobiology and endocrinology to developmental psychology and evolutionary biology.

This approach recognizes that behaviors do not arise from a single cause, but are the product of a multifactorial arc of influences. Any given explanation, whether focused on genes, hormones, or childhood experiences, implicitly invokes all the preceding biological and environmental factors that shaped that outcome. There are no neat, isolated "disciplinary buckets" - each type of explanation is the end result of the complex interplay between various systems.

By expanding the scope of analysis to encompass this broader web of influences, from the neurological to the cultural, we can develop a richer, more nuanced understanding of why people think and act the way they do. This interdisciplinary perspective allows us to appreciate the true complexity of human behavior, moving beyond simplistic single-factor explanations. It is an essential tool for grappling with our most complicated and consequential behaviors.

Here are examples from the context that support the key insight about the importance of interdisciplinary thinking:

  • The author states that "when you explain a behavior with one of these disciplines, you are implicitly invoking all the disciplines—any given type of explanation is the end product of the influences that preceded it." This means that a neurobiological, genetic, or developmental explanation for a behavior inherently involves factors from multiple disciplines.

  • The author gives the example of saying "The behavior occurred because of the release of neurochemical Y in the brain." This statement also implies explanations from other disciplines like "The behavior occurred because the heavy secretion of hormone X this morning increased the levels of neurochemical Y" and "The behavior occurred because the environment in which that person was raised made her brain more likely to release neurochemical Y in response to certain types of stimuli."

  • The author emphasizes that "there are not different disciplinary buckets. Instead, each one is the end product of all the biological influences that came before it and will influence all the factors that follow it." This illustrates the interconnectedness of different disciplines in understanding behavior.

  • The author states that "studying behavior is useful for understanding the nature of the brain" and "sometimes studying the brain is useful for understanding the nature of behavior." This highlights the bidirectional and interdependent relationship between different domains of study.

  • The author notes that "the brain is not where a behavior 'begins.' It's merely the final common pathway by which all the factors in the chapters to come converge and create behavior." This emphasizes the need to consider a wide range of influences beyond just the brain.

In summary, the context emphasizes the importance of an interdisciplinary approach that integrates insights from multiple fields, rather than relying on a single disciplinary explanation, to fully understand the complex factors shaping human behavior.

Behavioral Complexity and Subtypes

The book explores the profound context dependency of behaviors, making them difficult to define and categorize. Behaviors that may be considered "good" or "bad" can only be understood in relation to their specific context. For example, an act of aggression could be justified if it is done to protect others, while the same act could be considered unjustified if it targets an innocent person.

Similarly, the book delves into the nuances of empathic states, such as sympathy, compassion, and emotional contagion. These states can vary in their cognitive and emotional components, and can have different motivations and consequences. The book highlights that true empathy, where one genuinely understands and feels for another's distress, is distinct from more superficial or obligatory forms of helping behavior.

The key insight is that behavioral complexity arises from the interplay of various factors, including neurobiology, genetics, childhood experiences, culture, and evolution. Simplistic categorizations of behaviors as "good" or "bad" fail to capture this nuance. Instead, the book advocates for a more holistic, multifactorial approach to understanding the subtypes and context-dependent nature of our best and worst behaviors.

Here are examples from the context that support the key insight about the complexity of defining and categorizing behaviors:

  • The book discusses how different disciplines have varying ways of categorizing and defining types of aggression, such as:

    • Animal behaviorists distinguish between offensive and defensive aggression, as well as conspecific aggression and fighting off predators.
    • Criminologists distinguish between impulsive and premeditated aggression.
    • Anthropologists care about levels of organization underlying aggression, such as warfare, clan vendettas, and homicide.
    • There are also distinctions between reactive/provoked aggression and spontaneous/instrumental aggression.
  • Similarly, the book highlights the challenges in defining and categorizing more positive behaviors like empathy, sympathy, compassion, etc. There are distinctions between:

    • Sensorimotor contagion (activating sensory/motor regions when observing others) versus emotional contagion (automatically sharing strong emotional states).
    • Sympathy (feeling sorry for someone's pain) versus empathy (understanding and taking the perspective of someone's pain).
    • Compassion (resonating with distress in a way that motivates helping) versus more detached states like sympathy or perspective-taking.
  • The book notes that these terms and concepts often have different meanings across disciplines, leading to challenges in establishing clear definitions and boundaries. For example, the concept of "altruism" is interpreted differently by psychologists, neuroscientists, and others.

  • The book emphasizes that these behaviors are highly context-dependent, with their interpretation and underlying biology shifting based on factors like the relationship between individuals, the specific situation, and the evolutionary/cultural context.

Influence of Early Development and Environment

The early years of development are crucial in determining an individual's future behaviors and personality. Experiences and environments during childhood have a profound and lasting impact, shaping the brain and neural pathways in ways that persist into adulthood.

For example, the presence or absence of a nurturing, responsive mother-child bond can significantly influence an individual's emotional regulation, social skills, and even cognitive abilities later in life. Disruptions to this critical early relationship, such as prolonged separation or neglect, can lead to lasting challenges like anxiety, aggression, and difficulty forming healthy relationships.

Similarly, the broader family and social environment a child grows up in plays a major role. Authoritarian, permissive, or neglectful parenting styles tend to produce distinct adult personality types - from conformist to impulsive. The peers a child interacts with also shape their development of social competence and where they fit into social hierarchies.

In essence, the experiences and stimuli a person encounters in their formative years, from the womb to early childhood, fundamentally shape the neural architecture and behavioral tendencies that will characterize their adult self. Understanding this powerful link between early life and later outcomes is crucial for supporting healthy child development and preventing negative long-term consequences.

Here are key examples from the context that support the insight that early childhood experiences and environmental factors play a pivotal role in shaping adult behavior:

  • Separating rat pups from their mothers for just a few hours daily leads to the pups having elevated glucocorticoid levels, being anxious, and the male pups being more aggressive as adults.

  • In the early 20th century, experts recommended against picking up or handling crying infants too often, leading to a rise in the "wasting away" phenomenon of "hospitalism" where hospitalized children died from lack of physical contact and interaction.

  • John Bowlby's attachment theory challenged the view of infants as simple organisms, showing that children need love, warmth, affection, and consistency from their mothers for healthy development.

  • Harry Harlow's experiments on infant rhesus monkeys showed they form strong attachments to "surrogate mothers" made of terry cloth, rather than just seeking out the source of food, disproving Freudian and behaviorist views.

  • Childhood adversity, such as abuse, neglect, or exposure to violence, increases the risk of adults developing depression, anxiety, substance abuse, impaired cognition and impulse control, and antisocial behavior.

  • Childhood poverty is linked to higher glucocorticoid levels, thinner frontal cortex, poorer frontal function like working memory and impulse control in young children.

These examples illustrate how early life experiences, from maternal separation to childhood adversity, can have lasting biological impacts that shape adult behavior and outcomes.

Biological and Environmental Interplay

The interplay between genes and environment is crucial in shaping behaviors and traits. Genes provide a biological foundation, but their expression and influence depend heavily on the environmental context. This gene-environment interaction means that the same gene can have vastly different effects depending on the surrounding circumstances.

For example, a gene variant linked to increased risk of depression may only confer that risk when combined with childhood trauma. Likewise, a gene variant associated with higher intelligence may only benefit cognitive development in children from high socioeconomic status families, as poverty can restrict the expression of genetic potential. These context-dependent effects demonstrate that genes do not rigidly determine outcomes - their impact is moderated by environmental factors.

Recognizing this interplay is essential for understanding the origins of complex behaviors. Simplistic notions of "nature vs. nurture" fail to capture the dynamic, reciprocal relationship between biology and environment. Behaviors emerge through an intricate dance between an individual's genetic predispositions and the shaping influence of their life experiences. Appreciating this nuanced interplay is key to unraveling the roots of both our best and worst tendencies.

Here are examples from the context that support the key insight about the interplay between biology and environment:

  • The context discusses gene/environment interactions, where "different gene variants have diametrically opposite effects in different environments." For example:

    • The disease phenylketonuria arises from a single gene mutation, but whether it causes brain damage depends on the person's diet - if they eat a normal diet, the mutation is harmful, but if they eat a phenylalanine-free diet, there is no damage.
    • A gene called 5HTT that codes for a serotonin transporter increases depression risk, but only when coupled with childhood trauma.
    • The FADS2 gene, involved in fat metabolism, is associated with higher IQ but only in breast-fed children.
  • The context also discusses how heritability scores for traits can vary dramatically depending on the range of environments studied. In more homogeneous environments, heritability is high, but in diverse environments, heritability can be very low, as "genes are nearly irrelevant to cognitive development if you're growing up in awful poverty."

  • An example is provided of hypothetical "identical twin boys" - one raised as an Orthodox Jew in the Amazon, the other as a Nazi in the Sahara. This extreme difference in environments would allow behavior geneticists to see how much of their similarities and differences are due to genes versus environment.

In summary, the key examples illustrate how the effects of genes on behavior are highly dependent on the environmental context, and how the relative contributions of biology and environment can shift dramatically based on the range of environments studied. The interplay between these factors is crucial for understanding the development of complex behaviors.


Let's take a look at some key quotes from "Behave" that resonated with readers.

You don’t have to choose between being scientific and being compassionate.

It's possible to approach complex issues with both a rational, evidence-based mindset and a deep sense of empathy. These two perspectives are not mutually exclusive, but rather complementary, allowing us to understand and address problems in a more holistic and effective way. By embracing both the scientific and the compassionate, we can develop a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the world around us.

The brain is heavily influenced by genes. But from birth through young adulthood, the part of the human brain that most defines us (frontal cortex) is less a product of the genes with which you started life than of what life has thrown at you. Because it is the last to mature, by definition the frontal cortex is the brain region least constrained by genes and most sculpted by experience. This must be so, to be the supremely complex social species that we are. Ironically, it seems that the genetic program of human brain development has evolved to, as much as possible, free the frontal cortex from genes.

Our brain's development is heavily influenced by our life experiences, particularly during childhood and young adulthood. The part of our brain that makes us who we are, the frontal cortex, is shaped more by our environment than by our genes. This unique characteristic allows humans to adapt and evolve as a complex social species. As a result, our brain's development is more influenced by external factors than by our genetic makeup.

Why should people in one part of the globe have developed collectivist cultures, while others went individualist? The United States is the individualism poster child for at least two reasons. First there's immigration. Currently, 12 percent of Americans are immigrants, another 12 percent are children of immigrants, and everyone else except for the 0.9 percent pure Native Americans descend from people who emigrated within the last five hundred years. And who were the immigrants? Those in the settled world who were cranks, malcontents, restless, heretical, black sheep, hyperactive, hypomanic, misanthropic, itchy, unconventional, yearning to be rich, yearning to be out of their damn boring repressive little hamlet, yearning. Couple that with the second reason - for the majority of its colonial and independent history, America has had a moving frontier luring those whose extreme prickly optimism made merely booking passage to the New World insufficiently novel - and you've got America the individualistic. Why has East Asia provided textbook examples of collectivism? The key is how culture is shaped by the way people traditionally made a living, which in turn is shaped by ecology. And in East Asia it's all about rice. Rice, which was domesticated there roughly ten thousand years ago, requires massive amounts of communal work. Not just backbreaking planting and harvesting, which are done in rotation because the entire village is needed to harvest each family's rice. The United States was not without labor-intensive agriculture historically. But rather than solving that with collectivism, it solved it withe slavery.

The development of individualistic or collectivist cultures can be influenced by historical factors such as immigration and the type of agriculture practiced. In the case of the United States, the influx of immigrants seeking novelty and a better life contributed to the growth of individualism. On the other hand, in East Asia, the labor-intensive process of rice farming required communal effort, leading to the development of collectivist values.

Comprehension Questions

0 / 29

How well do you understand the key insights in "Behave"? Find out by answering the questions below. Try to answer the question yourself before revealing the answer! Mark the questions as done once you've answered them.

1. What is the disadvantage of attempting to categorize human behavior into distinct disciplinary buckets?
2. How does the book exemplify the concept that no single factor can explain human behaviors entirely?
3. Why is it important to adopt a holistic approach when studying human behavior?
4. How do the three metaphorical layers of the brain support the concept of interconnected factors in behavior?
5. How does the same act of violence become either condemnable or commendable?
6. Why is violence considered a double-edged sword?
7. What is the significance of understanding the context in which violence occurs?
8. How do passive-aggressive forms of violence differ from physical acts of violence?
9. What do the terms 'hot-blooded' and 'cold-blooded' violence refer to?
10. Why is it insufficient to analyze human behavior through the lens of just one discipline?
11. How do different academic disciplines interact to explain human behaviors?
12. What is implied when a behavior is attributed to a specific neurochemical change in the brain?
13. Why is it important to use an interdisciplinary approach to study human behavior?
14. What does the statement ‘the brain is not where a behavior begins’ signify in understanding human behavior?
15. What role does context play in determining whether a behavior is considered 'good' or 'bad'?
16. What distinguishes true empathy from more superficial forms of helping behavior?
17. How does the complexity of behavior arise according to the book?
18. What are the differences between sympathy and empathy outlined in the book?
19. How do different disciplines influence the understanding and categorization of aggression?
20. How do early childhood experiences impact an individual's adult behavior and personality?
21. What are the potential long-term psychological impacts of a poor mother-child bond during early development?
22. How do variations in parenting styles influence adult personality types?
23. Why is it essential to understand the influence of early life experiences on later outcomes?
24. Describe the biological impacts of a child facing adversity during their formative years.
25. What is the role of the environment in the expression of genetic traits?
26. How does the interaction of genes and environment influence behavior?
27. Why is it incorrect to think of genetic influences on behavior as fixed or rigid?
28. What is meant by 'gene-environment interaction'?
29. How do context-dependent effects of genes illustrate the importance of environment in understanding traits?

Action Questions

0 / 8

"Knowledge without application is useless," Bruce Lee said. Answer the questions below to practice applying the key insights from "Behave". Mark the questions as done once you've answered them.

1. How can you identify and integrate multiple influences in your understanding of a person's behavior or decision-making process?
2. How can you better assess the nature of violence in different contexts to respond appropriately?
3. In what ways can you contribute to a more nuanced understanding of violence in your community?
4. How can you apply an interdisciplinary approach to better understand a specific behavior or issue in your community?
5. What practical steps can you take to develop a more holistic understanding of your own behavioral patterns and how they are influenced by your environment?
6. How can you apply the understanding of context dependency in behaviors to improve your interpersonal relationships?
7. How can you create a positive, nurturing environment for children in your care to support their emotional and cognitive development?
8. How can understanding the gene-environment interaction influence your approach to mental health and well-being?

Chapter Notes


  • Categorical Thinking vs. Holistic Approach: The author argues against the tendency to explain complex human behaviors using categorical, discipline-specific explanations (e.g., "it's just a hormonal issue" or "it's a cultural problem"). Instead, the author advocates for a holistic approach that considers the interplay of various biological, psychological, and cultural factors that shape human behavior.

  • Complexity of Human Behavior: Understanding human behaviors, especially those related to aggression, violence, and cooperation, is incredibly complex. It involves a multitude of factors, including brain chemistry, hormones, sensory cues, prenatal environment, early experience, genes, biological and cultural evolution, and ecological pressures.

  • Ambiguity of Violence: The author highlights the ambiguity of violence, noting that it can be both an act of "hideous aggression" and "self-sacrificing love." This ambiguity makes violence a profoundly challenging aspect of the human experience to understand.

  • Humans as Animals and Unique Beings: Humans share many biological similarities with other animals, such as the same hormones and brain chemicals. However, humans also exhibit unique behaviors, such as constructing cultures based on beliefs about the nature of life and transmitting these beliefs across generations.

  • Passive-Aggressive and Subtle Forms of Harm: The author provides examples of how humans can harm each other in subtle, passive-aggressive ways, such as the wife throwing a grape lollipop at the rude driver, or the military group bringing a gamelan orchestra to "make it more beautiful" during a massacre.

  • Intertwined Biology of Harm and Care: The author suggests that the biology underlying human behaviors of harming and caring for one another can be deeply intertwined, highlighting the complexity and nuance of the human experience.

  • Importance of Interdisciplinary Thinking: The author emphasizes the need to avoid simplistic, discipline-specific explanations for human behaviors and instead adopt an interdisciplinary approach that considers the various biological, psychological, and cultural factors at play.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Defining Key Terms is Challenging: The chapter discusses the difficulty in defining key terms related to human behavior, such as aggression, violence, compassion, empathy, etc. This is because these terms are often the subject of ideological battles and have different meanings in different scientific disciplines.

  • Aggression has Many Subtypes: The chapter provides several examples of how aggression can be categorized into different subtypes, such as offensive vs. defensive aggression, conspecific aggression vs. fighting off a predator, impulsive vs. premeditated aggression, reactive vs. spontaneous aggression, and hot-blooded vs. cold-blooded aggression.

  • Positive Behaviors are also Difficult to Define: The chapter notes that defining positive behaviors, such as empathy, sympathy, reconciliation, forgiveness, and altruism, is also challenging. For example, the concept of "pure altruism" is debated, as it's unclear whether any altruistic act can be completely separated from the expectation of reciprocity, public acclaim, self-esteem, or the promise of paradise.

  • Context Dependency of Behaviors: The chapter emphasizes that the meaning and interpretation of behaviors, whether positive or negative, are highly dependent on the context in which they occur. The same physical action (e.g., pulling a trigger or applying a bandage) can be interpreted as either right or wrong depending on the context.

  • Warm-blooded vs. Cold-blooded Behaviors: The chapter discusses the distinction between "hot-blooded" (emotional) and "cold-blooded" (affectless) behaviors, both positive and negative. It suggests that we tend to understand and empathize more with hot-blooded behaviors, while cold-blooded behaviors, whether good or bad, can be unsettling and difficult to comprehend.

  • Opposite of Love is Indifference, not Hate: The chapter introduces the quote from Elie Wiesel, which suggests that the opposite of love is not hate, but indifference. This highlights the similarity between the biologies of strong love and strong hate.

  • Behaviors Defined by Meaning, not Motoric Features: The chapter emphasizes that the meaning and context behind our behaviors are more important and challenging to understand than the physical actions themselves. The same motoric features can be interpreted as either right or wrong depending on the context.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • The Triune Brain Model: The brain is divided into three functional layers: (1) an ancient, regulatory layer that mediates automatic functions; (2) a more recently evolved layer that processes emotions; and (3) the recently evolved neocortex that handles cognition, memory, and abstract thought. These layers are interconnected and influence each other, rather than being strictly hierarchical.

  • The Limbic System: The limbic system, particularly the amygdala, is central to processing emotions like fear and aggression. The amygdala receives sensory inputs, learns associations between stimuli and emotional responses, and coordinates physiological and behavioral responses to emotional events.

  • The Frontal Cortex: The frontal cortex, especially the prefrontal cortex, is responsible for "doing the harder thing when it's the right thing to do." It regulates behavior, controls impulses, and mediates the interplay between emotion and cognition in decision-making.

  • The Dopaminergic System: The dopaminergic system, originating in the ventral tegmental area and projecting to the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex, is involved in processing rewards, anticipating rewards, and motivating goal-directed behavior. It plays a key role in learning, addiction, and delayed gratification.

  • Interaction of Brain Regions: The amygdala, frontal cortex, and dopaminergic system work together in complex ways to influence behavior. For example, the frontal cortex can regulate the emotional responses of the amygdala, and the dopaminergic system can motivate the frontal cortex to exert self-control.

  • Limitations of Neuroscience: Neuroscience can provide insights into the biological basis of behavior, but it should not be used to simply validate or "prove" what we already know about someone's internal experiences or to excuse or forgive harmful behaviors. Neuroscience is one piece of the puzzle in understanding human behavior.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Ethology vs. Behaviorism: Ethology focused on the variety of behaviors across species and the unique adaptations of each species, while behaviorism focused on universal rules of behavior like operant conditioning.

  • Sensory Triggers of Behavior in Animals: Animals use a variety of sensory modalities to communicate and trigger behaviors, including auditory (vocalizations), visual (body language, facial features), and olfactory (pheromones) cues.

  • Subliminal and Unconscious Cuing: Sensory information that is too brief or subtle to be consciously perceived can still influence behavior, such as the rapid processing of race, gender, and social status cues in faces.

  • Racial Biases: Subliminal exposure to black faces activates the amygdala (associated with fear) more than white faces, and reduces activation in the fusiform face area (associated with facial recognition), contributing to racial biases.

  • Interoceptive Information: Internal bodily signals, like hunger, pain, and fatigue, can influence behavior by affecting self-control and emotional regulation in the frontal cortex.

  • Unconscious Language Effects: Subtle priming with certain words can unconsciously shift thoughts, feelings, and behaviors in a more pro-social or anti-social direction.

  • Group Membership Cues: Subtle cues about group membership, like wearing a team's colors, can influence helping behavior and attitudes towards outgroups.

  • Broken Windows Theory: The presence of minor signs of disorder and norm violations can unconsciously encourage further norm-violating behaviors, creating a "slippery slope" to more serious crimes.

  • Sensory Sensitivity Modulation: The brain can alter the sensitivity of sensory systems, making certain stimuli more or less influential on behavior, such as becoming more sensitive to food smells when hungry.

  • Culture Shapes Perception: Cultural differences in individualism vs. collectivism shape how people visually attend to and remember focal objects vs. contextual information.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Testosterone's Effects on Aggression: Testosterone does not directly cause aggression. Rather, it amplifies preexisting tendencies toward aggression, particularly during challenges to one's status or dominance. Testosterone levels alone do not predict individual differences in aggression, and castration does not eliminate aggression entirely, suggesting that aggression is not solely dependent on testosterone.

  • Oxytocin and Vasopressin's Effects on Prosociality: While oxytocin and vasopressin facilitate social bonding, trust, and cooperation, their effects are contingent on the social context. These hormones increase prosocial behavior toward an "in-group" (e.g., one's family or social group), but can also increase ethnocentrism and xenophobia toward "out-groups".

  • Female Aggression: Females can exhibit adaptive forms of aggression, such as maternal aggression to protect offspring. This aggression is facilitated by a complex interplay of hormones, including estrogen, progesterone, and androgens. The link between premenstrual symptoms (PMS) and aggression is minimal, except in rare, extreme cases.

  • Stress and Impaired Brain Function: Sustained stress has numerous adverse effects on brain function, including:

    • Increased amygdala activity and fear learning
    • Impaired frontal cortex function, leading to poorer decision-making, risk assessment, and impulse control
    • Decreased empathy and prosocial behavior
  • Alcohol and Aggression: Contrary to popular belief, alcohol does not universally increase aggression. Alcohol only increases aggression in individuals who are already predisposed to aggressive behavior or who believe that alcohol increases aggression, due to the power of social learning.

  • Hormonal Effects are Contingent and Facilitative: Hormones do not directly cause or command behaviors. Instead, they make individuals more sensitive to social triggers and exaggerate their preexisting tendencies in emotionally-laden domains. The ultimate determinants of behavior come from the social learning and other factors discussed in the subsequent chapters.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Synaptic Strengthening and Long-Term Potentiation (LTP): Experience that causes repeated firing across a synapse can "strengthen" it, with a key role played by the neurotransmitter glutamate. LTP is the process by which the initial burst of NMDA receptor activation causes a prolonged increase in excitability of the synapse, involving changes like increased glutamate receptors and sensitivity. LTP occurs throughout the nervous system, not just in the hippocampus.

  • Stress and Synaptic Plasticity: Moderate, transient stress promotes hippocampal LTP, while prolonged stress disrupts it and promotes long-term depression (LTD). Sustained stress enhances LTP and suppresses LTD in the amygdala, boosting fear conditioning, while suppressing LTP in the frontal cortex, helping explain stress-induced impulsivity and poor emotional regulation.

  • Structural Plasticity: Neurons can form new dendritic branches and spines, increasing the size of their dendritic tree, or retract them. Hormones like estrogen and stress hormones mediate these effects. Axons can also sprout new projections, a process called "remapping" that allows sensory neurons to adapt to changes, like blind people's tactile cortex taking over parts of the visual cortex.

  • Adult Neurogenesis: The adult brain, including the human brain, generates new neurons throughout life, a discovery that was long resisted by the scientific establishment. These new neurons integrate into existing circuits and are important for functions like "pattern separation" in the hippocampus.

  • Broader Implications of Neuroplasticity: While neuroplasticity has exciting potential for recovery from injury, it is a value-neutral process - it can lead to both beneficial and detrimental changes. The extent of neuroplasticity is finite, and it is unlikely that we can directly manipulate it to make people more open-minded or empathetic. However, the scientific demonstration of brain malleability can make personal and societal transformations seem more tangible and possible.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Delayed Frontal Cortex Maturation: The frontal cortex is the last brain region to fully mature, not reaching full maturity until the mid-twenties. This delayed maturation has important implications for adolescent behavior.

  • Frontal Cortex Maturation Process: During adolescence, the frontal cortex undergoes a process of "neural Darwinism" - it initially overproduces neurons and synapses, then prunes away the less optimal connections. This results in a more efficient, but not necessarily larger, frontal cortex.

  • Cognitive Maturation: Adolescents show steady improvements in cognitive abilities like working memory, flexible rule use, and perspective-taking, as the frontal cortex matures.

  • Emotional Regulation: Adolescents experience emotions more intensely than children or adults, due to the imbalance between the still-developing frontal cortex and the more mature limbic system. Reappraisal strategies for emotional regulation improve during adolescence as the prefrontal cortex takes over this function from the ventral striatum.

  • Risk-Taking and Novelty-Seeking: Adolescents exhibit increased risk-taking and novelty-seeking behaviors, which are linked to the exaggerated dopaminergic responses in the reward system and the immature frontal cortex's inability to effectively regulate these impulses.

  • Peer Influence: Adolescents are highly sensitive to peer influence and social acceptance, which can lead to increased risk-taking and "deviance training" when in the presence of peers. This is due to the adolescent's heightened social sensitivity and the frontal cortex's inability to effectively regulate these social influences.

  • Empathy and Moral Reasoning: Adolescents exhibit heightened empathy and emotional responsiveness, but their moral reasoning and ability to act on their empathic impulses is still developing due to the immature frontal cortex.

  • Adolescent Violence: The peak in adolescent violence is not caused by a surge in testosterone, but rather the combination of heightened emotional intensity, craving for peer approval, novelty-seeking, and the still-developing frontal cortex's ability to regulate these impulses.

  • Evolutionary Perspective: The delayed maturation of the frontal cortex may have evolved to allow for the creativity, exploration, and social intelligence that characterize adolescence, which are important for human development and adaptation, even though they can also lead to risky or impulsive behaviors.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Childhood is a period of increasing complexity in behavior, thought, and emotion, which typically emerges in stereotypical, universal sequences of developmental stages. These stages concern the sequence in which they emerge, how experience influences their speed and surety, and how this helps create the adult a child ultimately becomes.

  • The stages of human brain development make sense, with neuron formation, migration, and synaptogenesis mostly prenatal, while myelination proceeds for a quarter century. Myelination particularly facilitates brain regions talking to one another, and the later a brain region matures, the less it is shaped by genes and the more by environment.

  • Piaget's four stages of cognitive development are: Sensorimotor (birth to ~24 months), Preoperational (~2 to 7 years), Concrete Operational (7 to 12 years), and Formal Operational (adolescence onward). These stages involve increasing complexity in reasoning, logic, and abstraction.

  • Theory of Mind (ToM) is the understanding that other individuals have different information, thoughts, beliefs, and knowledge than oneself. ToM develops in stages, from gaze following to primary ToM to secondary ToM, with the speed of transitions influenced by experience.

  • Empathy progresses from feeling someone's pain because you are them, to feeling for the other person, to feeling as them. The neurobiology of empathy in kids shifts from more concrete regions to increased engagement of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and ToM regions.

  • Kohlberg's stages of moral development are: Preconventional (obedience and self-interest), Conventional (relational and conformity to social norms), and Postconventional (based on internal moral principles). Most adolescents and adults reason at the Conventional level.

  • The marshmallow test demonstrates that older kids use more effective strategies like distraction and reappraisal to resist immediate gratification, and that marshmallow wait time predicts later outcomes like higher SAT scores and lower BMIs. This reflects the maturation of the frontal cortex and its increasing connectivity with the rest of the brain.

  • Mothers are crucial for child development, as shown by experiments with isolated infant monkeys and the phenomenon of "hospitalism" in children deprived of maternal contact. Attachment theory emphasizes the importance of the mother-infant bond for healthy development.

  • Childhood adversity, such as abuse, neglect, poverty, and exposure to violence, increases the risk of adult depression, anxiety, substance abuse, impaired cognition, and antisocial behavior. These effects are mediated by biological changes like elevated glucocorticoids, impaired frontal cortex development, and hyperactive amygdala.

  • Prenatal environmental factors, such as maternal stress, nutrition, and hormones, can have organizational effects on the developing brain that persist into adulthood. For example, prenatal testosterone exposure masculinizes the brain and influences behaviors like aggression and toy preferences.

  • Epigenetic changes, where environmental factors alter gene regulation, provide a mechanism by which childhood experiences can persistently influence adult brain and behavior. Experiences like maternal care style can produce epigenetic changes that are passed on to the next generation.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Genes are not autonomous agents that command biological events. Instead, genes are regulated by the environment, which includes everything from events inside the cell to the external world.

  • Much of DNA is involved in regulating gene transcription, rather than directly coding for genes. Evolution is more about changing gene regulation than changing the genes themselves.

  • Epigenetic changes can allow environmental effects to be lifelong or even multigenerational. Epigenetic mechanisms involve chemical modifications to DNA or surrounding proteins that affect gene expression.

  • Neurons contain a mosaic of different genomes due to transposable genetic elements that can randomly insert DNA sequences. This introduces genetic variability within an individual's brain.

  • The influence of a gene on the average value of a trait (inheritance) is distinct from its influence on variability of that trait across individuals (heritability). Heritability scores are specific to the environments studied.

  • Gene-environment interactions are ubiquitous and can be dramatic. The effect of a gene depends on the environmental context, so you cannot simply ask what a gene "does" - you have to ask what it does in a particular environment.

  • Behavior genetics studies consistently show that individual genetic variants have small effects on behavior. Behaviors are influenced by large numbers of genes, each playing a tiny role.

  • Genetic effects on behavior tend to be nonspecific. A single gene variant can be associated with multiple behavioral and psychiatric disorders, reflecting the complex networks of genes involved.

  • Genes provide context-dependent tendencies, propensities, potentials, and vulnerabilities for behavior, rather than deterministic inevitability. Genetic influences are embedded within the broader biological and environmental factors shaping behavior.


  • Collectivist vs. Individualist Cultures: Collectivist cultures emphasize harmony, interdependence, and conformity, while individualist cultures emphasize autonomy, personal achievement, and the needs of the individual. These cultural differences have biological correlates, such as differences in brain activity and physiological responses to social situations.

  • Pastoralists and Southerners: Pastoralist cultures, such as those in the Middle East and Africa, tend to have higher rates of militarism, monotheism, and "cultures of honor" that emphasize retaliation for affronts to self, family, or clan. The American South has been characterized as a Westernized example of a "culture of honor."

  • Stratified vs. Egalitarian Cultures: Cultures with greater income inequality tend to have lower levels of social capital, trust, and cooperation, as well as higher rates of crime and violence. This is due to both psychosocial factors (e.g., stress from feeling poor) and neomaterialist factors (e.g., the wealthy's reduced incentive to invest in public goods).

  • Population Size, Density, and Heterogeneity: Larger, denser, and more heterogeneous populations have led to the development of mechanisms for norm enforcement among strangers, such as third-party punishment and the emergence of "Big Gods" who punish moral transgressions.

  • The Residues of Cultural Crises: Cultures that have experienced chronic threats, such as hunger, disease, and environmental degradation, tend to be "tighter" with more autocratic governments, suppression of dissent, and enforcement of behavioral norms.

  • Hunter-Gatherers and Warfare: The evidence on the prevalence of warfare among hunter-gatherer societies is mixed, with some studies suggesting it was relatively rare, while others argue it was widespread. Nomadic hunter-gatherers seem to have been less prone to warfare than more sedentary, resource-rich hunter-gatherer groups.

  • The Invention of Agriculture and the Rise of Warfare: The transition from nomadic hunter-gatherer to agricultural and pastoral societies is associated with an increase in the prevalence and scale of warfare, likely due to factors such as the accumulation of surplus resources, the emergence of socioeconomic inequality, and the increased sedentism of populations.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Evolution rests on three steps: (a) certain biological traits are inherited by genetic means; (b) mutations and gene recombination produce variation in those traits; (c) some of those variants confer more "fitness" than others, and over time the frequency of more "fit" gene variants increases in a population.

  • Evolution is about reproduction, not survival: An organism living centuries but not reproducing is evolutionarily invisible. The difference between survival and reproduction is shown with "antagonistic pleiotropy", where traits that increase reproductive fitness early in life yet decrease life span.

  • Group selection is not a valid evolutionary mechanism: Animals do not behave for the good of the species. They behave to maximize the number of copies of their genes passed into the next generation, as shown by examples of competitive infanticide.

  • Kin selection: Individuals can accrue fitness benefits by helping relatives pass on copies of their genes. This explains patterns of cooperation and competition based on degree of relatedness.

  • Reciprocal altruism: Unrelated animals frequently cooperate, as it is evolutionarily advantageous for non-relatives to cooperate under certain conditions, such as repeated interactions and the ability to recognize and remember cheaters.

  • Multilevel selection: Evolution can occur at multiple levels, including the individual, kin group, and group. Neo-group selection, where a trait is maladaptive at the individual level but adaptive at the group level, has been observed in humans.

  • Humans exhibit a mix of evolutionary strategies: While humans show evidence of individual selection, kin selection, and reciprocal altruism, we also have many deviations from the predictions of these models, likely due to our ability to manipulate our perception of relatedness.

  • Debates over adaptationism, gradualism, and the role of genes: There has been significant debate over whether all traits are adaptive, whether evolution occurs gradually or in punctuated bursts, and the extent to which behavior can be explained by specific genes. These debates have had political undertones.

  • Biology is about propensities, not simple causes: Understanding behavior requires considering multiple interacting factors, including genes, hormones, development, and environment, rather than seeking single causal agents.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Rapid and Automatic Us/Them Dichotomies: The brain forms Us/Them dichotomies very quickly, within milliseconds, through automatic and unconscious processes. This tendency is seen even in other primates, demonstrating its evolutionary basis.

  • Multiple and Shifting Us/Them Categories: Humans belong to multiple, often overlapping Us/Them categories, and the relative importance of these categories can shift rapidly based on context and priming. This flexibility is a uniquely human capacity.

  • Positive Feelings Toward Us, Negative Toward Them: We view members of our in-group (Us) more positively, with feelings of pride, trust, and a sense of shared obligation. We view out-group members (Them) more negatively, with feelings of threat, disgust, and a tendency to see them as homogeneous and less competent.

  • Rationalization of Us/Them Biases: Our conscious thoughts and justifications for our Us/Them biases often lag behind and rationalize our automatic, emotional responses. We engage in cognitive gymnastics to maintain positive views of Us and negative views of Them.

  • Malleability of Us/Them Categorization: While Us/Them dichotomies are deeply ingrained, they can be manipulated through priming, contact, and emphasizing shared attributes or goals. Reducing essentialism and hierarchical thinking can also lessen the strength of Us/Them biases.

  • Ubiquity and Inevitability of Us/Them-ing: Complete elimination of Us/Them-ing is likely impossible, as it serves important psychological functions. The goal should be to channel this tendency toward more benign and constructive forms of group identification and cooperation.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Hierarchy and Rank in Humans and Other Species: Hierarchies are a common feature across many social species, where individuals have different ranks and access to resources. In humans, we belong to multiple hierarchies simultaneously, and our rank in these hierarchies can have significant impacts on our physiology and psychology.

  • The Neurobiology of Hierarchy and Rank: The size of the neocortex and its functional coupling with other brain regions, such as the superior temporal gyrus and prefrontal cortex, are associated with an individual's rank and the complexity of their social group. Higher-ranking individuals tend to show greater expansion and functional connectivity in these brain regions.

  • The Physiological Consequences of Rank: An individual's rank can have significant impacts on their physiology, with lower-ranking individuals often showing elevated stress hormone levels, poorer cardiovascular health, and impaired immune function. However, the specific physiological consequences depend on the meaning and stability of the hierarchy, as well as the individual's personality.

  • Socioeconomic Status (SES) and Health: Humans have taken the concept of hierarchy to an extreme with the invention of socioeconomic status, which has a profound and pervasive impact on health outcomes. The "health/SES gradient" shows that lower SES is associated with poorer health, even in countries with universal healthcare, suggesting the psychological stress of low status is a key factor.

  • The Neurobiology of Political Orientation: Political orientation appears to be rooted in deep-seated cognitive and affective differences, such as sensitivity to ambiguity, threat perception, and moral foundations. These differences are reflected in the structure and function of brain regions like the amygdala, insula, and prefrontal cortex.

  • Conformity, Obedience, and Resistance: Humans have a strong tendency to conform to the opinions and behaviors of others, as well as to obey authority figures, even when this leads to unethical or harmful actions. However, there are also individuals who resist these pressures, and factors like the nature of the authority, the context, and the victim can modulate the likelihood of conformity and obedience.

  • The Neurobiology of Conformity and Obedience: The discovery that one's opinion differs from the group activates brain regions involved in reinforcement learning and memory revision, suggesting that conformity involves not just public compliance but also private acceptance of the group's position. Obedience to authority involves a struggle between cognitive and emotional brain regions, with stress and anxiety biasing individuals toward subordination.

  • The Banality of Evil and the Banality of Heroism: Classic studies like the Milgram experiments and the Stanford Prison Experiment have shown that ordinary people are capable of committing horrific acts when placed in certain situations and under the influence of authority and group pressure. However, these studies also reveal that "heroism" – the willingness to resist such pressures – is often more accessible and less extraordinary than commonly assumed.


Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Moral Reasoning vs. Moral Intuition: There is an ongoing debate in the field of moral philosophy and psychology about whether moral decision-making is primarily based on moral reasoning (cognitive processes) or moral intuition (emotional/automatic processes). The chapter explores evidence for both perspectives.

  • Primacy of Moral Reasoning: The chapter presents evidence that moral decision-making involves significant cognitive processes, such as reconstructing scenarios, understanding causes and consequences, and perspective-taking. Moral reasoning activates brain regions like the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC).

  • Social Intuitionism: However, the chapter also reviews evidence that moral judgments are often driven by rapid, automatic intuitions rooted in emotion, rather than deliberative reasoning. This "social intuitionist" view holds that moral reasoning is often used to rationalize intuitive moral responses.

  • Moral Judgment in Infants and Animals: The chapter discusses research showing that infants and other primates exhibit rudimentary forms of moral judgment, such as preferences for "nice" over "mean" agents. This suggests that the foundations of human morality may have evolutionary roots.

  • Dual Process Theory of Moral Judgment: The chapter presents a "dual process" model, where moral decisions can involve a mixture of intuitive and reasoned processes. Certain contexts (e.g. personal harm) tend to engage more intuitive, deontological judgments, while other contexts (e.g. impersonal harm) engage more reasoned, utilitarian judgments.

  • Moral Judgment and Context: The chapter emphasizes that moral judgments are highly context-dependent, influenced by factors like framing, emotional state, social identity, and physical proximity. This helps explain variability in moral decision-making.

  • Morality and Deception: The chapter explores the neuroscience of honesty and deception, showing that resisting the temptation to lie involves cognitive control processes in the prefrontal cortex, while effective lying requires both cognitive and emotional processes.

  • Automaticity of Moral Behavior: The chapter suggests that for some individuals, consistently moral behavior (e.g. honesty) becomes an automatic, implicit response, rather than the result of effortful moral reasoning or willpower. This "grace" rather than "will" view of moral behavior is contrasted with the struggle experienced by those who must actively resist temptation.


  • Empathy, Sympathy, and Compassion: These terms represent a continuum of resonating with someone else's adversity, ranging from simple sensorimotor contagion (e.g., feeling a hand being poked) to the cognitive component of understanding the cause of someone's pain (empathy) to the compassionate act of actually helping (compassion).

  • Emotional Contagion and Mimicry in Animals: Many animals display building blocks of empathic states, such as emotional contagion (e.g., a pack of dogs sharing states of arousal) and mimicry (e.g., young chimps learning from observing their mother). Some animals even show more advanced forms of "consolation" behavior, where they proactively try to alleviate the distress of another individual.

  • Empathy Development in Children: Children's empathic states progress from feeling sorry for physical pain to emotional pain, and from feeling "for" someone to feeling "as if" it were happening to them. This development is reflected in the maturation of brain regions involved, such as the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula, and areas associated with Theory of Mind.

  • Affective and Cognitive Components of Empathy: Both emotional and cognitive processes contribute to empathic states, with the balance shifting depending on the situation. The ACC is central to the affective component, while the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and Theory of Mind regions are involved in the more cognitive aspects, such as understanding the cause and intentionality behind someone's pain.

  • Limitations of the "Mirror Neuron" Explanation: While mirror neurons may play a role in some low-level aspects of understanding others' actions, the claim that they explain empathy, language, and social cognition has been heavily criticized as overhyped and unsupported by evidence.

  • Empathic States Do Not Guarantee Compassionate Action: Feeling someone's pain does not necessarily lead to actually helping them. Factors like self-oriented perspective, cognitive load, and one's own distress can prevent empathic states from translating into effective, selfless compassionate acts.

  • Detachment and Automaticity in Compassionate Acts: Paradoxically, a degree of detachment and having compassion as an automatic, implicit imperative (rather than a cognitively effortful process) may be more conducive to effective, selfless compassionate acts than being overwhelmed by vicarious distress.

  • Self-Interest in Altruistic Acts: Even seemingly altruistic acts often contain elements of self-interest, such as reputational benefits, a sense of moral self-worth, or the "warm glow" of doing good. Truly selfless altruism appears to be rare.


  • Metaphors and Symbols Have Real Consequences: The chapter explores how humans confuse metaphorical and literal meanings, with serious consequences. For example, people are willing to kill or be killed over cartoons, flags, clothing, or songs, because the brain intermixes the symbolic and the real.

  • Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC) and Insula Mediate Metaphorical and Literal Pain: The ACC processes both physical and social pain, while the insula mediates both visceral disgust and moral disgust. This intermixing of literal and metaphorical sensations leads to behaviors like feeling someone else's pain or being less helpful after washing one's hands.

  • Metaphors Become Literal through "Neural Reuse": The brain's ability to handle novel symbolic and metaphorical capacities in humans has evolved rapidly, leading to the "co-opting" of existing brain regions like the ACC and insula. This "neural reuse" can cause the brain to confuse the metaphorical and the literal.

  • Dehumanization and Pseudospeciation Enable Atrocities: Propagandists exploit the brain's tendency to confuse metaphors and symbols with reality, using dehumanizing language (e.g., calling a group "cockroaches") to engage the insula and enable atrocities, as seen in the Rwandan genocide.

  • Acknowledging Sacred Values Can Promote Peace: In intractable conflicts, addressing the sacred symbolic values of the "other side" can be key to promoting peace, as seen in examples from the Middle East, Northern Ireland, and South Africa. Respecting the humanity and pride in the other's symbols can be more important than material concessions.


  • The chapter discusses the debate around the role of biology and free will in shaping human behavior, particularly in the context of the criminal justice system.

  • The author argues that the prevailing view of "mitigated free will" - the idea that we have some free will that can be constrained by biological factors - is flawed and ultimately requires the existence of a homunculus, or a non-biological entity that controls our behavior.

  • The author presents several examples of how the law has grappled with the role of biology in criminal responsibility, such as the M'Naghten rule, which excuses individuals who cannot distinguish right from wrong due to a "defect of reason from disease of the mind."

  • The author critiques the distinction made by some, like legal scholar Stephen Morse, between "causation" and "compulsion," arguing that this distinction still requires the existence of a homunculus that can be overwhelmed by "compulsion" but not "causation."

  • The author argues that our behaviors are shaped by a complex, multifactorial array of biological factors that science is only beginning to uncover, making it difficult to accurately predict individual behavior based on biological factors alone.

  • The author suggests that as our scientific understanding of the biological bases of behavior continues to expand, future generations will likely view our current criminal justice system, which is based on notions of free will and moral responsibility, as primitive and misguided.

  • The author proposes that the criminal justice system should move away from the idea of punishment as a virtue and instead focus on protecting the public and rehabilitating offenders, while acknowledging the biological determinants of behavior.

  • The author acknowledges the difficulty of fully embracing the implications of denying free will, even for our own positive traits and behaviors, and suggests that we may have to settle for making our homuncular myths more benign.

Seventeen: WAR AND PEACE

Here are the key takeaways from the chapter:

  • Improved Behaviors Over Time: The world has seen significant improvements in various behaviors over time, such as the abolition of slavery, decline in child labor, and better treatment of animals. However, violence and other negative behaviors still persist, especially in certain parts of the world.

  • Reasons for Improved Behaviors: Pinker attributes the decline in violence to the "civilizing process" where states monopolize force, and the spread of commerce and trade, which fosters empathy and an "escalator of reasoning." However, critics argue that this view is Eurocentric and ignores the West's continued violence in other parts of the world.

  • Role of Religion: Religion can have both positive and negative effects on behavior. While it can promote in-group prosociality, it can also fuel out-group hostility. The effects depend on the specific features of the religion, such as the presence of a moralizing, punitive god.

  • Intergroup Contact: Intergroup contact can reduce prejudices, but it works best when the groups are equal in number and treatment, in a neutral setting, and have a shared goal. However, the effects are often transient, and contact can also worsen tensions in certain circumstances.

  • Cooperation and Punishment: Humans have evolved sophisticated mechanisms for fostering cooperation, such as open-ended play, multiple games, open-book play, and punishment. Punishment can be particularly effective when it is administered by third parties and institutionalized.

  • Singular Acts of Individuals: Individuals can have a significant impact on the world, as seen in the cases of Mohamed Bouazizi, Zenji Abe, Hugh Thompson, and John Newton. These individuals were able to catalyze change or overcome their own biases and prejudices.

  • Potential for Collective Action: The examples of the Christmas Truce and the "Live and Let Live" phenomenon during World War I demonstrate the potential for collective action and cooperation, even among enemy soldiers, when certain conditions are met.

  • Importance of Remembering the Past: The chapter emphasizes the importance of remembering past examples of reconciliation, cooperation, and individual acts of courage, as they can inspire and guide us towards a more peaceful future.


What do you think of "Behave"? Share your thoughts with the community below.